Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudden Death Seven-ball

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sudden Death Seven-ball[edit]

Sudden Death Seven-ball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since May of 2007 with no attempts to substantially improve the article. WP:BEFORE turned up some passing mentions and a forum thread, with most mentions being in the context of a television schedule, not WP:SIGCOV. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Sports. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Some mentions on a SportsBall website, that's all. Lack of any substantial sourcing in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 17:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm, I think the issue here is going to be the timing. It's a 2000-2006 events. Despite what the article says, it did run for six years, which is a reasonable run, and clearly for it to be organised/broadcast by ESPN, it's a big enough event. here's AZBilliards covering the event for instance. However, with it being early 2000s, a lot of the sources will be offline or dead by now from my experience of pool sources. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 22:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for finding that! It looks like they covered it one other time but that article reads a bit primary to me given the ad at the top and bottom. I will do some additional digging later this evening and see if anything else comes up. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 22:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, the other one is just a reformatted press release, but this one was written by AZBilliards themselves, so would be a suitable measuring stick. It's only one source though, but I would expect contemporary sources from this time period to cover this, which would likely be mostly offline. Maybe newspaper.com is a good place to check. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 06:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Pool magazines like Billiards Digest and Inside Pool probably also covered it, but I don't have back-issue collections of them any longer.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  07:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: My additional research tonight did not turn up much else. I found a decent number of passing mentions in the form of awards lists/sports database entries and two new articles. Unfortunately,Cuesight seems to be an online store and PoolRoom seems to mostly be unedited press releases. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 00:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Found several trivial mentions of the subject in news articles/books or being part of some programming table. The only significant coverage that I came across is in this forum, which does not seem very reliable. For now it seems to lack enough appropriate coverage to pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This and some previouso deletions or deletion discussions of borderline-notable media related to cue sports makes me think we need a List of cue sports media sort of article, to listify such subjects, as they clearly pass WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE even if WP:Notability is a bar they're finding it hard to hurdle due to their niche-audience nature not generating coverage that is easy to find. If this one is deleted, please WP:REFUND it to User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Sudden Death Seven-ball. There are some other previously deleted pool/billiards/snooker TV show and video game articles that I should probably have dug up out of page histories, as the old stubs on them would make reasonable list entries.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.