Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/String squeak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to string (music). Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

String squeak[edit]

This is not notable, it has been abandoned, there are no references, and it is already covered on the page string (music). Conical Johnson (talk) 08:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to string (music), which does not presently cover some of the aspects of this article (e.g., whether or not these sounds are desirable, and their inclusion in some notable recordings). JulesH (talk) 11:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Whether or not they are desirable is really a non-anything. It isn't really a matter of whether it's desirable, because it is a fact of life for someone playing roundwound strings. That's similar to asking whether key click sounds are desirable on an organ. It is one natural aspect of the sound of the instrument. As for naming songs in which one can hear string squeak, we may as well edit the drum page to name all the songs in which the drummer can be heard to drop his stick, or songs in which one can hear the clicking keys of a clarinet. Conical Johnson (talk) 23:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to string (music). Merge in any pertinent information not already in string (music). A list of songs containing string squeak is not really notable. Therefore, I suggest a redirect, not a merge, since all we really need to do is redirect to the string (music) article as is. -- kainaw ™ 15:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cut to a paragraph and Merge to string (music). Squidfryerchef (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, and copy the paragraph if it fits in. Seems like a useful redirect to have. --fvw * 02:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.