Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm(Novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedied as a G7. Normally I'd be cautious about interpreting a page blanking during an AfD as consent to delete, but the edit summary "Deleted" seems like sufficient communication. Protonk (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Storm(Novel)[edit]

Contested Prod - Author deleted prod notice, and prod2, with the explanation "Just becasue it is unpublished doesnt mean it can't be sold on the internet from sites that support new writers. The author is new to writing." Clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) - it's unpublished, and the author is not notable. Delete. --Dawn Bard (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Hqb (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. IF it is published, it may obtain notability, but as of now, it has not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability, crystal ball, advertisement, etc. Drmies (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I hope it's a big success when it comes out. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and wait until this is published, if ever. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. As a strictly formal matter, a purported novel which is both unfinished and unpublished is not verifiable. --TS 08:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The author has blanked the page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.