Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Nguyen (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:NPOL, overwhelming community consensus is that US state level assembly members are presumed notable. WP:SNOW closure, unnecessary to continue the AfD. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Nguyen (politician)[edit]

Stephanie Nguyen (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Unferefenced WP:BLP. Happy to accept WP:HEY as the outcome. Truly unsure if a state assembly politician passes WP:NPOLITICIAN, and willing to be corrected, I would have sent this back to Draft for references. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A state level politician is deemed notable, as are provincial MPP's here in Ontario. The article is pretty bare, but needs updating. Oaktree b (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's not exactly WP:HEY territory, but I've cited the content and fixed the formatting errors. I am not commenting on notability as I don't know the specific guidelines for politicians, but at least it's in the normal wikipedia format now. 21:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep As a California State Assemblymember, this passes WP:NPOL. The page needs more sources and biographical information, but it passes notability. Stanloona2020 (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WP:NPOL, and except for lacking references, the article before the AfD was satisfactory for existence. Onetwothreeip (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.