Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statistical Modelling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical Modelling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic journal. The article was deprodded by Mark viking with 2 sources added that don't prove notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This journal has an impact factor and is indexed in JCR and Scopus. It thus satisfies notability criteria #2 and #3 per WP:NJournals. --Mark viking (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a legitimate journal in statistics, containing some highly cited papers. OtterAM (talk) 02:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: unfortunately, neither being legitimate nor containing highly-cited papers makes a journal notable. --Randykitty (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Indexed in SCI, Scopus, and other selective databases, clear meet of WP:NJournals. Article needs cleanup per WP:JWG. (perhaps I'll have time for that later today or tomorrow). --Randykitty (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:NJournals DeVerm (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clear pass of WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.