Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Austell RFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 20:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

St Austell RFC[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rugby club. Article is very sparingly sourced, and the one appearance they appear to have made in the news fails WP:NOTINHERITED (one of their players was killed in an RTD) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination - not notable club which seems to fail Wikipedia:WikiProject_Rugby_union/Notability. --Bob Re-born (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.