Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SportsLink (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SportsLink[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable leisure center - this is nothing more than an advert both in style of writing and content. Previous AfD and RfD was for a different subject entirely. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- uncited promotional spam; the section "How to Join" is especially telling. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Run-of-the-mill and non-notable leisure centre which fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG (little/no independent coverage that establishes notability beyond just "existing" as a business). As per other comments, irrespective of notability of the subject, the article in it's current form also fails WP:NOTPROMO - to the extent that possibly even meets WP:G11 for speedy deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 23:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.