Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport and the Australian federal election, 2013
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sport and the Australian federal election, 2013[edit]
- Sport and the Australian federal election, 2013 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An exceptionally minor (basically non-existent) point in the election campaign; total trivia. Basically a random collection of largely unrelated facts drawn together by a tenuous common thread. Frickeg (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - "largely unrelated facts drawn together by a tenuous common thread" is spot on. StAnselm (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 05:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 05:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 05:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly created in good faith, but as this wasn't an important aspect of the election it's not a notable topic. Nick-D (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably the most telling sentence in the article is the final one in the first paragraph of the lead - "During the election, there was little debate between the major parties over sport policies." So no need for an article. HiLo48 (talk) 06:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- strong delete as all of above. Using synthesis to try to invent a notable topic out of routine announcements such as stadium upgrades and somehow listing announcements during an electoral term."During the period of the Gillard Government (2010-2013), there were several Parliament of Australia inquiries into current sport issues". Listing sportspeople as politicians does not relate to government or opposition policy on sport. LibStar (talk) 13:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - article content does not disclose sufficient grounds for notability. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 12:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and close per every contribution above. Timeshift (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.