Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spock's Beard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Notability established (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 06:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Spock's Beard[edit]
- Spock's Beard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability guidelines pretty badly... Mythpage88 (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep You're kidding me? Easily passes WP:MUSIC#5 - released multiple albums on notable record labels (Metal Blade, Radiant Records, InsideOut Music). Lugnuts (talk) 09:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly notable band that has released many albums on labels that are easily big enough for WP:BAND #5 and has recieved plenty of coverage, e.g. Allmusic (see also reviews), Classic Rock, Canoe, Arizona Republic, PopMatters, The Encyclopedia of Popular Music, etc.. In the absence of any sensible deletion rationale or attempt to follow WP:BEFORE, I think this could be speedily kept.--Michig (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep with a side of fish. Notability requirements were met a long time ago. Umbralcorax (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Passes WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Subject meets WP:GNG and, at the least, criteria 1 and 5 of WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 01:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. As others have said, notability requirements were met a long time ago. Curious though, why do you think this band fails notability guidelines?Mrix1985 (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Spock's Beard is a prominent representative of Progressive Rock in the new millennium, listed in Oor's Pop-encyclopie 2010[1]. See also chart listings on rateyourmusic.com[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bart1967 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.