Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splurt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as Z-MC. Sandstein (talk) 07:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splurt[edit]

non-notable, and "facts" are unverifiable. Kingturtle (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure. I can find sources to confirm that Z-MC has charted a song in Finland [here] and [here], which would establish notability under WP:MUSIC. I'm having considerably more trouble finding a reliable source to say that Z-MC is now known as Splurt, although that is repeated widely on the net. Xymmax (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep either as Splurt with a redirect from Z-MC or vice versa. Notability has been established by Xymmax. Naming of the article is an editing issue, not a deletion one. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Z-MC, as per Xymmax. I also can't find info backing up the name change, so that section may need to be rewritten to reflect that it's widely reported but may not be true. [1] may be helpful to creating a discography section. --Fabrictramp (talk) 22:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A very strong delete. This appears to be a self-promotional page. The original author Splurtysplurt has made no other contributions. If he were truely notable, somebody else would have cared enough to improve his "home page" in the last 11 months. Wikipedia isn't in the free hosting business. Daniel Santos (talk) 07:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of edits and the amount of editors really has no baring on this discussion. --Neon white (talk) 02:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move, passes criteria 2 of WP:MUSIC, just barely, but did it under a different name. Suggest a move to Z-MC. Lankiveil (talk) 00:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Move. I am in agreement with the above that this artist does indeed meet WP:MUSIC requirements. As said, though, the name which reliable sources to this charting need be the one of the article's title. SorryGuy Talk 03:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.