Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparks (charity) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sparks (charity)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant COI (creator of the page is User:SparksCharity), and the only significant coverage I found of the charity was this Bloomberg profile and this article on its merger. The "significant rewrite" clamored for in the first AfD never happened, and it fails WP:GNG. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 04:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect: I added a couple of references but they rely heavily on primary sources, concerning this small charity's operational merger. Aside from these and the routine listings which provide the other references, I can find passing mention confirming Jimmy Hill's involvement in its foundation but nothing sufficient for the current WP:ORGDEPTH requirements. A redirect/merge of a sentence into Great_Ormond_Street_Hospital#Great_Ormond_Street_Hospital_Children's_Charity could be an alternative to outright deletion, though that may still require better WP:RS coverage to avoid being undue coverage. AllyD (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and start over - The article has been in this COI scenario since the creator made it in 2009. The first AfD called for keeping the article provided it gets rewritten. As stated above, it never happened. The majority of the edits have a COI - this will be present regardless of a rewrite and given its history of COI editors - it needs TNT to start over. – The Grid (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.