Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparks (charity)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sparks (charity)[edit]

Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)

fails WP:N and cites only primary references. There may also be WP:COPYVIO issues. Article seemingly created by someone connected with the charity, so is probably also WP:COI. Has been nominated for speedy a couple of times, but user always reverts nomination. TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as copyvio [1] pablo_hablo. 15:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rewrite - There's a few sources online of varying merit [2], [3], [4], [5], but this version is a copyvio and needs a rewrite. If the end decision here is keep, I volunteer for the job. Also a point of clarification - this is not The Spark Center, formerly the Children's AIDS Program. FlyingToaster 15:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but write, this is one of the biggest charities in the UK. - fchd (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rewrite - charity is well known and very notable. Readro (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Must confess I hadn't heard of this charity until I saw the article. Taking a closer look at the subject, however, I see that it does enjoy the support of some fairly high profile people, and I'm informed that it is, indeed, well known, so WP:N is probably not appropriate here. I really nominated it because it had been speedied a few times with the creator removing the tag, and I thought we needed a wider consensus on the matter. It needs some serious work doing to it as there are copyvio issues, but I'm sure it can be sorted out. TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.