Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Force One

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Transportation of the president of the United States. If anyone wants to merge the content from behind the redirect, feel free. Daniel (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force One[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Space Force One (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a call sign that does not exist, but might exist in the future if the organization ever has responsibility for transporting the US President. Single source in article is an FAA document that does not mention the subject. WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: t | c | a   23:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - if that doesn't violate WP:CRYSTALBALL, I don't know what does. No coverage or even speculation from reliable sources. Aside from this mildly amusing political cartoon, it doesn't even appear that anyone has thought about the issue. If this call sign is ever used, then an article might be appropriate, but until then it's just the intersection of speculation and original research. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 03:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This article is probably under WP:Crystal because that this is unverifiable, and is pure speculation. ThatIPEditor (talk) 06:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The FAA document states for all military services; having this article is consistent with having an article for Coast Guard One which has also never flown. Coast Guard two has happened, but to be consistent either Space Force One should exist or Coast Guard One should not exist and that page should be moved to Coast Guard Two Alpacaaviator (talk) 13:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - for violating WP:CRYSTALBALL. Setreis (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this is it is just the dictionary definition. Making it worse, it is a dictionary definition for a term there is no evidence people have ever used, because it describes something that there has existed. If it has been used it would be in some obscure work of science fiction, and even there it might be a very obscure reference indeed. "I got a call from President George P. Bush while he was traveling aboard Space Force One". There it has been used, but that does not make it notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - while I would love for this to be able to be expanded, as of now it simply falls under WP:DICDEF. While a real nomenclature, as pointed out above it has never been used, and is unlikely to be used in the near future, so WP:CRYSTAL would definitely apply. Onel5969 TT me 17:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. If you are going to delete this stub, make sure to redirect it to Transportation of the president of the United States and if possible expand a bit the info already found in this target page explaining that Space Force One/Two does not yet officially exist. This should help dissuade newbies from recreating this page ad infinitum. Cordially, History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 06:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your good-faith reminder. I have seen the SKYBLUELOCK before, IMO I would save salting for controversial cases. History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 12:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Space_Force_One&oldid=1001553910"