Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged to Rogue Trooper. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Southers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Argento Surfer: Better discuss this deletion :: the Rogue Trooper scenario is well-known. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It was a PROD, not a speedy delete, and "Well known" is relative. It may be "well known" within the Rogue Trooper circle, but it's certainly not "well known" like Superman, Casablanca, The Great Wall of China, or the planet Mars. It was originally PROD'd by @Soetermans: with the rationale "Article on a fictional faction, written from an in-universe tone. Not a single source, and nothing that can't be covered by the article Rogue Trooper." I supported it with the statement "no indication of notability outside of the fiction, sufficiently discussed on Rogue Trooper." Because of the similarity, I copied the PROD to Norts. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Norts and Southers have stood since May 2006 unqueried. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norts. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Rogue Trooper - not notable outside the comic strip. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.