Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Sudan: Peace Status

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to South Sudanese Civil War. T. Canens (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

South Sudan: Peace Status[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written fork of South Sudanese Civil War, specifically sections 2.3 to 2.6. Confusingly, this article's scope appears to be about both the 2015 peace agreement and the 2018 peace agreement, but not the conflict that occurred between those dates. I definitely could see articles being written about those two peace accords individually, but lumping them together into one article as is the case here is not the way to go about doing that. While deletion is not cleanup, I think it would be less work to write brand new articles about these subjects (using content in South Sudanese Civil War as a starting point) rather than to try to adapt the material in this article into two new articles. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but reduced to a stub. Even I, an inclusionist, cannot defend this foolishness. I totally understand the nom's rationale. The subject itself is notable but as this article stands, it needs re-editing, not deletion. The scope of this article should be made clear in the lead and possibly a renaming of the article.Tamsier (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to South Sudanese Civil War. This article is a bad one but the Civil War article needs amending, so that there is a section on the 2018 peace agreement, distinct from that on the negotiations for it. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge South Sudanese Civil War to per Peterkingiron. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.