Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somalis in Germany

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article passes WP:GNG as discussed by participants. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 14:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Somalis in Germany[edit]

Somalis in Germany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small community, no refs, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep changed vote due to article improvement.   // Timothy :: talk  08:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Demographics_of_Germany#Foreign_nationals_in_Germany, adding an entry in the table. (t · c) buidhe 04:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:SIGCOV (therefore WP:GNG googling in German turns up a number of sources. With the handful of sources already in the article, the subject should pass WP:GNG. These are major news outlets, but it is also likely that there are more sources from German authorities, but I haven't yet figured out which German words in "bureaucratic Deutsch" to search for. Any ideas?
A Thousand Words (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear consensus, and two different suggested merge targets
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 17:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as meeting WP:GNG. Plenty of coverage, e.g. here, here, here, here, here and here, on top of what's in the article or mentioned above. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Passes GNG, being a small community has no impact on notability. User:Störm seems to be on a deletion spree and not putting in the BEFORE research that should done.★Trekker (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.