Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of April 11, 2108

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Solar eclipse of April 11, 2108[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There should be too early for us to create a story that happened 80 years later. Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. Predicted solar eclipses are already listed at List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_22nd_century. Per WP:FUTUREEVENT, future events follow normal notability guidelines, and therefore is not notable. Ap m h 14:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century just like we do for every other "future" eclipse that goes this route. Primefac (talk) 06:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century per Primefac and this RfC: general consensus is that future eclipses that do not meet WP:GNG/WP:NASTRO should be redirected. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 19:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.