Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soham Lahiri

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 18:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soham Lahiri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Soham Lahiri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN notabilty cannot be inherited from a "famous" father. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – he might be a talented young man, but that does not mean he is notable. It looks like he has been mentioned a few times in local newspapers, but I can't see anything that amounts to significant coverage, so WP:GNG is not met, and neither is WP:ENT. Maybe he will become notable in the future, and then somebody unconnected to him will probably create an article. --bonadea contributions talk 14:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – The article appears to have been declined twice at AFC, by virtue of that alone I can’t agf. This article will be deleted, not for the stubbornness of the article creator but because the subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A GNG fail. Celestina007 (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not have SIGCOV.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 15:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:GNG, article also looks promotional. ColinBear (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Father page is also going through AFD. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per all of above Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Notable Bengali Personality with coverage in multiple reliable sources including printed newspapers of Bengali language.This is a clear case of systemic bias. Vtbn21 (talk) 05:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC) — Vtbn21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep: Notable Bengali poet and guitarist with coverage in multiple reliable sources including printed newspapers of Bengali language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.251.171.102 (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC) The DUCK is quacking strongly here... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - In agreement with all the "delete" voters above. Good luck to the kid but he has not yet been noticed outside of his family circle. The previous voter who has accused the community of systemic bias is encouraged to provide evidence. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. Can't inherit from his father. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This subject meets WP:GNG. The person has many in-depth coverage including one in the most renowned and wide circulated daily newspaper Puber Kalom[1]. I would request the nom Theroadislong to please include this discussion in Bengali subject related articles. Articles from the West Bengal, India lacks online publications. Vtbn21 (talk) 4:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC) — Vtbn21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    The above has already !voted keep above. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The reference is from Puber Kalom. Other print editions cut-out of many newspapers has been uploaded on Wix site. The Bengali language newspapers have less online presence. Any Bengali language editor can tell you that. This is why I mentioned systemic bias in my earlier comment. Vtbn21 (talk) 5:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
    You still need to show us how these sources contribute to the article subject meeting WP:GNG (which is not helped by the fact you're not providing translations for those of us who don't read Bengali) - i.e. the sources need to provide significant coverage (a passing mention is not enough, and the coverage needs to be more than just routine run-of-the-mill stuff), the sources need to be independent from the article subject (so not the person's website or social media accounts), and there needs to be multiple of them. You also seriously must stop using multiple accounts. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    One reference is from Puber Kalom which link I have provided. Articles in renowned and widely circulated newspaper proves that he is notable. Not only that his name was also published on other newspapers but they have no any online publications as I have said that India lacks oline publication. For that the other cited sources have been provided with publication name, date, reporter name and newspaper name with their RNI no. for verification in the notes section. You can also see here [[2]]. I would request the nom Theroadislong to Please check them. Vtbn21 (talk) 4:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Soham_Lahiri&oldid=1021442505"