Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Mendez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Mendez[edit]

Non-notable actress. Google search lists social networking as top finds, and one hit on anime.com for voicework. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 14:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable actress. Schuym1 (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: NN actress with a trivial IMDb entry ... fails WP:ENTERTAINER ... also note: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Minutes to Heaven ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.91.179 (talk · contribs) _{20:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
- Comment Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Davis (actor). — 72.75.91.179 (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as non-notable.--Boffob (talk) 05:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NN, although she's pretty hot. Evidence of sock and meat activity in the revision history. -- Scjessey (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:BIO. I agree with Scjessey, though; she's a pretty girl. Prettiness != notability, however. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 16:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per related discussions HERE Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable OR, written by meatpuppets. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 19:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article asserts she is best known for a film that has not been released yet, which seems an excellent example of non-notability. Edward321 (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "best known for (a movie that hasn't finished filming yet)" says it all to me. From a policy/guideline perspective we're talking failure to meet both notability and verifiability criteria. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.