Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Minutes to Heaven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

12 Minutes to Heaven[edit]

Original research and crystal ball gazing to promote a non-notable film. Scjessey (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have previously proposed this article for deletion, but the editors of the article (one of whom appears tied to the project) justified its existence by noting a "MySpace" fanbase (see Talk:12 Minutes to Heaven) -- Scjessey (talk) 19:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vanity article for a non-notable project. JuJube (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL ... the IMDb entry says that it is still in production ... also note: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Mendez ... and a serious WP:COI since author Retrojew89 (talk · contribs) is also Evan Davis (actor), as admitted on their user talk page ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.91.179 (talk · contribs) _{20:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 23:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of any notability. Google search doesn't find much, and when you take away the Wikipedia, MySpace and YouTube links, you're left with not very much at all. PC78 (talk) 23:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why do people think this would be a justified article? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. Let it return when it is released and can supply sources that are not blogs, myspace, or youtube clips. Hard to believe it survived an earlier AfD as there is nothing in THIS search but video clips, youtube links, or actor's personal websites, an an editor's personal involvement smacks loudly of WP:COI and thus WP:SPS. It passes WP:Crystal and WP:V in that it exists, but fails WP:N big time. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just discovered that the article author may be involved in puppetry in the editing of this article and the one about himself. If I am wrong, okay... but it looks bad. Per THIS, THIS, THIS and most importantly THIS, where Retrojew69 admites to being Evan Davis, it appears likely that User:Evan2001 and User:Retrojew89 may be the same person. This may be the mistake of a beginner (though he sure knew how to put an article together, badly sourced or no), so be kind, as it does not appear to be an abusive use of an additional account... just a perhaps misunderstanding of the rules. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Add GoldenMonkey78 (talk · contribs) to the list of sock/meatpuppets ... also see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Davis (actor). — 72.75.91.179 (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS, WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 16:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research, a crystal ball, non-notable and only edited by one editor and a meat/sockpuppet. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 18:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious Crystalballing. Edward321 (talk)
Delete non-notable, non-verifiable (absolutely Zero reliable 3rd party sourcing covering the subject in a significant manner). Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Several policies failed. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The first paragraph of the article clearly states: "12 Minutes to Heaven is a Trippy-Romantic Comedy to be released Independetly " (sic) which is obviously crystalballing. No sources that pass wp:rs are provided. Notability isn't even an issue, as the topic doesn't even yet exist. PHARMBOY (TALK) 00:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.