Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sijo Vadakkan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sijo Vadakkan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete lack of independent sourcing, so fails WP:GNG. I considered CSD A7, but I guess the unsourced assertions of having won some awards might pass the credible claim of significance bar, so thought better to bring here. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - Sources are all created by the person the article is about, and one of the sources is a broken link. Does not meet WP:GNG. Article is also very poorly written. ---GingeBro (talk • contribs) 14:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I concur with GingeBro but only because of one of the cited grounds for deletion - that the article does not meet WP:GNG. The other two reasons cited - self-creation and poor writing - are both serious problems, but article deletion is not stated to be the appropriate remedy for either under WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY,WP:EP,or WP:DEL-REASON.Deccantrap (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable businessman. No refs from independent sources. Fails WP:N. Jupitus Smart 02:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deletereads like a cut and paste from his business website. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 03:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.