Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoottheartist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. As this AfD received minimal participation, anyone may request restoration at WP:REFUND. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:03, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shoottheartist[edit]
- Shoottheartist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organization that fails WP:ORG. No evidence of significant coverage other than self-published books, videos, etc. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. No independent sources at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 20:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.