Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Stephon Clark (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No chance that this will be deleted per the snowball of keeps. (non-admin closure) -- Dane ^talk 18:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting of Stephon Clark[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This recreated article PRODefd as WP:NOTNEWS; PROD removed. Cannot see why this particular killing of a black man by lily law is or likely to become notable.TheLongTone (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this incident has already caused well documented large protest, and as the event is only a couple days old, it is too soon to saw that this event is unnotable. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - largely procedurally. The protest is enough to give it the benefit of the doubt for now. If there's no continued coverage/effect, it might be reasonable to revisit this discussion in a few months. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Google search of shooting of Stephon Clark shows wide coverage and that the coverage seems to be beyond simple news reporting of a current event. The shooting is being discussed in the context of a wider phenomenon of police shootings of unarmed suspects. Also, the shooting has already led to multiple protests [1]. Keep because topic seems to be encyclopedic and to meet GNG.--DynaGirl (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The protests (widely reported in the media even outside the media market) resulted from this shooting makes this incident notable.Acnetj (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect to List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, March 2018. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Continuing coverage and impact, resulting in protests, makes this notable.--Beneficii (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is widely covered, widely resulting in protests, and highly relevant to broader topics of historic significance (police shootings, BLM). I find it bizarre to think that nobody will be interested in reading this in 20,30,40 years. Ncpz (talk) 04:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – There is expansive news coverage on the shooting and subsequent demonstrations, making this notable. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 05:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, at the very least per WP:RAPID, due to wide coverage of various protests after this event.Icewhiz (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per today's Los Angeles Times: Unrest intensifies in Sacramento over police killing of unarmed Stephon Clark]. Also pas per WP:RAPID. It's WP:SNOWING. E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: there's no way this would close otherwise. It's not just about the shooting, but about the protests as well. Recommend this AfD be closed early. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've been trying to improve the article but there's a mountain of material available that I still haven't sifted through. A lot more needs to be done on the political reactions of various figures, and the protests — those things alone clearly demonstrate current and future notability. -Darouet (talk) 20:50, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep—Consequential public reactions distinguish notable police shootings from non-notable ones, for better or for worse. Pretty clear where this one falls, at least for the time being.--Carwil (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Already very notable and personally I think this is also an important topic to cover in the wake of recent protests. QEDK (後 ☕ 桜) 04:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: already notable and only getting moreso, not disappering after 15 mins. --Jeremyb (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Widespread coverage, even NBA players joined the protests.--Jamez42 (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.