Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shilole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shilole[edit]

Shilole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another upcoming musician with NO relevant topic to talk about , Fail Wikipedia Notability rules , few sources on the article seems NOT relieble sources , theres NO evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 12:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 12:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "No relevant topic to talk about" is not a reason for AfD. Also, she passes general notability guidelines. You can find the subject covered in a significant way in the following sources:

Heck, turns out she even owns a restaurant. Missvain (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep in view of the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified above that show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep no valid reason for deletion offered and sources have been obviously demonstrated. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the sourcing listed meets WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 03:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.