Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shigeo Iwatani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. No editor argued the topic met notability criteria, but no concerns about were expressed (or are visible to me) which would argue against userfication. joe deckertalk 06:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shigeo Iwatani[edit]

Shigeo Iwatani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. coverage is not about him as the subject but rather him commenting as a representative of the Japanese government. ambasssadors are not inherently notable. nor being from a "major country". LibStar (talk) 06:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The Japanese wiki article does not provide anything that points towards notability. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy I agree the subject isn't notable just now but I'd like the closing admin to put this in my userspace so I can work on it over the next few years. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom -fails WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy per Chris Troutman's request. Ambassadors are accepted as notable if they can be reliably sourced over WP:GNG, but they are not accepted as automatically notable just because they exist, if their mere existence is all you can actually reference. Normally I'd just vote to delete, but since Chris is willing to adopt this with an eye to possibly salvaging it, he should be given that opportunity. Bearcat (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.