Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sher Afzal Marwat
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Sher Afzal Marwat[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sher Afzal Marwat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this individual gained transient prominence through a televised altercation, his overall notability remains questionable. Primarily identified as a legal practitioner associated with political figures, he finds himself amidst a vast sea of legal professionals in Pakistan. The creation of dedicated articles for every lawyer navigating the political landscape would be an imprudent endeavor. Furthermore, his limited achievements in the political arena, lacking victory in any national or provincial elections, and the absence of a judicial role at the national or provincial level contribute to the deficiency of substantial notability as outlined by Wikipedia's specific guidelines, particularly WP:POLITICIAN and WP:JUDGE. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Nothing found that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 02:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.