Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Lewandowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheila Lewandowski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not asserted by sources or by article content. Quasar G ^{t - c} 15:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. She has a reasonable amount of coverage in The New York Times[1][2] and other New York media. However, since it all seems to be in relation to her theater, we should consider moving this article to Chocolate Factory Theater. Pburka (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG.Mentions and bits here and there, even in the NYTimes, doesn't meet GNG. There is no wide coverage of this person or her theater. WP:TOOSOON. SW3 5DL (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 01:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete The NY Times piece is a human interest story in the regional section, not the thing notability is made of. The 1 source here is to her own organizations website. Nothing showing that her organization is more notable than hundreds of other minor city theatres.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.