Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmistha Mukherjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sharmistha Mukherjee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't satisfy WP:NPOLITICIAN. She hasn't won any election. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep -Subject may meet the WP:NPOLITICIAN #3, WP:GNG and WP:BIO, as they appear to have significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources such as, Zee News, The Hindu 1, The Hindu 2, The Hindu 3, TImes of India, Indian Express 1, Indian Express 2 DNA 1, DNA 2, Business-Standard 1, Busness-standard 2, First Post 1, First Post 2, Rediff, Sify, Hindustan Times, Deccan Chronicle, Deccan Herald, Telegraph India, etc. There are actually are many more (Jagran, click for more Hindi sources).

I request nominator to withdraw as the subject meet WP:NPOL criteria #3 that says, "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article.". They are also a renowned Kathak dancer and have received coverage for. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WITHDRAW @Anupmehra: thanks for searching the sources. I want to withdraw this nomination.--Skr15081997 (talk) 12:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.