Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalom Lamm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shalom Lamm[edit]

Shalom Lamm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two reasons. First WP:BLP1E, and second, his "career" is that he was convicted of fraud. Bbb23 (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails Wikipedia notability standards.Makro (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or rename (with massive trim) to Bloomingburg electoral fraud (or similar). Coverage of the individual does not seem to reach SIGCOV without the crime. The crime itself seems to be notable per NCRIME.Icewhiz (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this was a minor crime that got very little coverage. Bearian (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.