Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seema Hamid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seema Hamid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability nor reliable sources; only passing mentions and kind of promo materials Edit.pdf (talk) 08:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are enough sources to be considered notable for a rather short article, and I can’t find any of these “passing mentions” the nominator is talking about because the references used in the article are all independent of her and talking about her in whole, not just a passing mention. Have you looked at the references before nominating? FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 10:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Bangladesh. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very think attempt at notability with ref stacking. I can't find extensive coverage of the person in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The coverage in the Dhaka Tribune articles does not meet SIGCOV (what is "World University of Leadership and Management"? their website is a shell) Other coverage seems to be primary sources, or otherwise insignificant. Not sure if this is of note, but none of the articles are attributed to authors. —siro χ o 10:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.