Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Jackson (Barbadian pianist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Jackson (Barbadian pianist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject meets none of the notability criteria at WP:NMUSIC, and none of the multiple issues tagged in 2015 have been addressed. Patrug (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment from nominator: The subject is a fine musician, but for the past year the only sources indicated for this WP:BLP are the subject's personal webpage, a five-year-old press release announcing a local church concert, and a self-posted YouTube video. The only WP:RELIABLE reference in the article's history, a Connecticut Post report with negative information about the subject, was deleted shortly after the article was created. —Patrug (talk) 05:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A good-faith Google search turns up little which could be used to expand the article, or any independent sources to verify what is in the article. --Jayron 32 04:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above. No reliable sources found. Triptothecottage (talk) 05:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find much on-line in 2015, but tagged rather than nominated for deletion, in case there were dead-tree sources - Arjayay (talk) 09:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That Connecticut Post report, which I thank Patrug for pointing out, is probably the most detailed and independent information about Sean Jackson available. It confirms beyond any doubt that Jackson is not sufficiently well-known or influential to justify a Wikipedia article. Syek88 (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:NMUSIC. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 02:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.