Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaboard World Airlines landing at Marble Mountain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seaboard World Airlines landing at Marble Mountain[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable enough for a stand-alone article per WP:EVENT and also does not meet inclusion criteria at WP:AIRCRASH - strictly speaking it isn't even a crash. A merger has been suggested, but as the article appears to consist mainly of OR with info from a web page that will not even open on my computer and a youtube video, I would knock that idea on the head as well YSSYguy (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It really seems to be a personal reminiscence about a not-notable incident, fails to meet any Wikipedia inclusion criteria that I can think of, including WP:N and WP:AIRCRASH. - Ahunt (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Reads like somebody telling a personal story. Quoting: "We had a few beers, watched the confusion, and then went back to bed". Sounds like a minor incident. Has 120000 views on youtube. Other link doesn't work. MakeSense64 (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No deaths, injuries or even damage. At best, it's worth a sentence in Marble Mountain Air Facility. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. So a plane landed at the wrong airfield in the dark, some editor says, searching his memory. Nobody killed, nobody hurt, no damage done, and the plane took off again the next morning, end of story. So? Not notable, and no reliable third-party sources. Textorus (talk) 20:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails WP:V and WP:N. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting story and Youtube video but, yeah, it's not notable. Nick-D (talk) 10:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nonsense & unencyclopedic article. Keb25 (talk) 14:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.