Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott's Flowers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bilby (talk) 03:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scott's Flowers[edit]

Scott's Flowers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only local notability, reads like an ad, talks of a dead cat that still stops traffic. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Advertising is semi-evident, little real notability, and information regarding the death of an owner's cat is painfully local. Flipandflopped (talk) 20:18, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
The link for the source on that one is also dead. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've found significant coverage of Katie's significant coverage of a man stopping traffic. If only we knew his motives. Perhaps he was doing it as a nod to the cat. But no, until some daring independent reporter ties it all together, my position hasn't changed. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It totally looks like an add. I can't see any relevance.--Fjsalguero (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.