Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoop (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 00:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scoop (TV series)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline and has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years because it's tricky. TV series on BBC, with notable actors and writers. I don't think it does pass WP:NOTABILITY though, based on coverage and significance. Boleyn (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- I agree that it's borderline and especially difficult to search for -- "scoop" is not a useful search term for news articles about much of anything, unfortunately, and given that it is associated with the BBC we're losing a whole range of potential independent sources. Google searches make it pretty clear that it's well known enough a quantity, though I fully acknowledge this isn't necessarily helpful in determining notability. However, it's a nationally broadcast show that lasted several years on the largest national broadcast network. This seems like the type of thing that WP:NTV is made for. It can at least be verified independently by [1], and has passing mentions in various articles about the participants. matt91486 (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NTV. I agree with Matt91486 that a BBC series that ran for three seasons is likely to be notable, even if currently searchable sources seem to be hard to find. — Toughpigs (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a kid's show so formulaic they have to keep it locked behind the service desk to prevent other bad writers from stealing their tired plots, but it just passes WP:TVSHOW and WP:NTV. Nate • (chatter) 01:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.