Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayantani Guhathakurta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 04:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sayantani Guhathakurta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress is not known for being in mainstream Indian cinema. The most of the content is a direct rip off from another language Wikipedia i.e., Bengali. More than that, the same person is editing both the wiki pages. Hatchens (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Contrary to the nom, translating articles from other language Wikipedias is allowed, as long as proper attribution is given. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia projects. Nor is it wrong for one editor to edit articles about the same subject on both the English Wikipedia and another language Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being in the mainstream is not the criteria we need to meet, being notable is. A quick search of Google news finds enough to think that notability may be there. As to "a direct rip off from another language Wikipedia", users are encouraged to translate articles from other Wikipedias. I've done so myself. That's not even close to a deletion reason.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The subject seems to have enough supporting roles in films to scrape through under WP:NACTOR. She also seems to be getting a lot of media attention, although most of it seems to be coming from the only-sometimes-reliable Times of India. But, given the volume of coverage, I don't think WP:GNG is necessarily failed in this instance. I'd be happy to let the article stand, especially as the subject's notability seems to be on an upward trajectory. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Played in over 15 movies, which is notable for me. TheImaCow (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.