Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sargeant Roger Hunkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sargeant Roger Hunkins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. Fails to establish notability. Item better suited for a genealogy site. reddogsix (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Robert Hastings Hunkins acted as legislator for WI, which is a notable position in WI history. -Kbabej (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As the creator of this article, Kbabej has a conflict of interest, so it is not proper for Kbabej to be weighing in here.71.139.148.125 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Kbabej certainly can and should discuss the article (s)he created here. (or "could" and "should" if they weren't currently blocked). Storkk (talk) 14:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

KEEP. Robert H. Hunkins is an "honored veteran pioneer" that served as Commissioner for Waukesha. He is notable for WI history, as Kbabej stated. AndyR112 (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: AndyR112 is a suspected sock-puppet of Kbabej. See AndyR112's edits. 71.139.148.125 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sargeant Roger Hunkins was very important of the development of Wisconsin politically-thanks-RFD (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. County commissioner + tax collector = non-notable politician. 71.139.148.125 (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 04:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the article is about his family (WP:NOTINHERITED). Being a local politician does not show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete local politician who doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN. Looks like his family was more notable than he was. Royal broil 04:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.