Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Simonds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Simonds[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by a SPA. It was originally redirected to the husband's article as the wife not being sufficiently notable for a standlone article. More material was added by an IP. I toyed with the idea of reverting it back to a redirect, but I didn't feel comfortable doing that, so I am nominating it for deletion as failingWP:GNG. Everything she does is derivative of her husband or the fact she is married to him. Bbb23 (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it should be added as a section on Kenneth Simonds' page? 2605:E000:100D:879E:D1E7:C213:2C04:AFC8 (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches for both Sarah Simonds and Sally Simonds convince me that the subject fails WP:GNG. There's not enough independent coverage. I checked three sources from the article (Hidden Harvest Fall Lunch, 2008 Awardees, ETSU Gets $1 Million), and they're only mentions of her. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.