Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Barrable-Tishauer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 18:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Barrable-Tishauer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Citing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argiris Karras as precedent, actors who are only notable for their appearance on "Degrassi: The Next Generation", and have little (ie. IMDb) to none sources, should be redirected to List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. 117Avenue (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. The cited "precedent" resulted in a redirect without deletion; therefore, there is no basis for bringing the matter to AFD rather than pursuing normal editorial processes. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and redirect - There is no deletion argument here at all, this is an editorial process to redirect the article. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 06:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect. Precedent relevant and applicable. --Griseum (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just now I added a source confirming her performance in the Toronto production of The Lion King. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and re-direct per nom. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Actress well-known for a single role in a popular TV series that generated lots of press, as evidenced by newspaper mentions (brief but non-trivial mentions of her) over multiple years; I've added a couple of examples but there are many more. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a single role makes a person notable, as seen by the other actors listed in List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters who don't have articles. 117Avenue (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a useful precedent in our treatment of other actors on this show. One size doesn't fit all. Different actors' roles and tenures on the show result in different degrees of coverage in reliable, secondary sources. That coverage, not the show, should drive our deletion decisions.--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect per nomination. Borderline case: 47 Google News Archive hits, but all to articles about the show, not about her (other than her show bio on CTV.com). --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Notability appears to be insufficient for a standalone article at this time, but I can't see why admin tools are needed here. How does deleting the history of this article assist anyone? If improperly recreated, the redirect can be protected, otherwise, if better sources appear the history could be useful. There's no case for deletion here at all. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.