Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Sriivastava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Sriivastava[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:DIRECTOR: No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I'm also nominating the following article created by the same user on the film he directed as I don't think it meets general notability guidelines. – GSS (talk|c|em) 15:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Power of Dahshat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the subject does not pass WP:DIRECTOR. Sources only report the commencement of the production of his first film The Power Of Dahshat. While the film itself may pass WP:NFILM because of the coverage it has received, the director is not notable (yet). — Stringy Acid (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Stringy Acid: I can see only two sources about the film published by TOI and one of them is weighted toward Priyanka Pandit and the other one read more like an advertisment, there is no in-depth coverage sufficient to show the film passes GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that this nomination involves two articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 06:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - both the articles. The director does not have any references that talk in depth about him. And the movie's references even though appear in the The Times of India, are reproduced from Bhojpurimedia.com, a non-WP:RS source, per a footnote in the news reports. Also the news reports for the movie do not cover it in any depth besides confirming that such a movie is being produced. Both fails WP:GNG.Jupitus Smart 11:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Neither passes WP:GNG, and the one doesn't pass WP:DIRECTOR and the other doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.