Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samanea Yangon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samanea Yangon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable real estate development, which seems to be the penchant of this editor (two other Samanea properties in AfD, and another one soon heading that way). Fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi editor, do note that I've disclose my relationship with the company, and it is alright to contribute to articles once I have disclosed the relationship i suppose? Also, my article was presented in a neutral way and citations from secondary sources were made. I am new to Wikipedia, please let me know if there is anything else I can do to not get the page deleted. Thank you for your help. Kinemas123 (talk) 01:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I mean, yeah, it's a random new market or something, but I've seen pages about North American malls frequently here, and this seems like the same thing, just in Myanmar. I'm conflicted, but I'm leaning towards this not being notable enough for a Wikipedia article, so yeah, weak delete. But if it stays up, it needs some work: no one cares about what streets its on or what its opening hours are. AdoTang (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep According to Myanmar's No 1 newspaper The Myanmar Times, It states [sig]: The Samanea Market, one of Yangon's largest wholesale markets, The markets have been built with a planned capacity for 730 shops and will provide jobs for up to 2000 local workers., and The market represents phase 1 of Myanmar's largest trading center project, with phase 2 being implemented on a nearby 300,000 square meter plot of land. There is enough to meet WP:GNG and one of the biggest markets in Myanmar's main city Yangon....looks notable to me. Btw, due to the current situations in Myanmar, no longer Burmese language editors active on En-Wikipedia. We should be slow to delete any of it. VocalIndia (talk) 03:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:44, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes WP:GNG from the significant coverage in an article from the The Myanmar Times, an article in Myanmore Magazine, and an article in Myanmar Business Today. I imagine there may be more coverage in Burmese-language sources (I think this might be one?), but these three English-language sources already provide significant coverage. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after a WP:BADNAC to see if consensus can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Barkeep49 Clearly non-consensus, relisted again again for what???? VocalIndia (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.