Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Marks (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sally Marks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not the same person as the previous AfD nomination and deletion. AllyD (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An appointment as chair of Surrey County Council does not appear sufficient for WP:POLITICIAN criterion 2 in its own right, and I am not seeing the coverage which could satisfy that condition by rising above the routine. AllyD (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Surrey County Council could be enough to get her into Wikipedia if she could be shown to have satisfied the "who have received significant press coverage" part of WP:NPOL #2, but it is not enough to get her an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing. But the only references here are two primary sources (documents on the websites of the local government bodies she served on, which do exactly nothing in terms of demonstrating notability) and one piece of purely WP:ROUTINE coverage of the election results themselves. This is not what it takes to make a county councillor notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN since this person is not a city mayor or an MP at least. A city councillor is a lower level position as a city can have numerous city councillors. --Artene50 (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 02:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.