Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahra Şaş

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sahra Şaş[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is a non notable actress who doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR seeing as she doesn’t apper to satisfy any criterion from NACTOR as she hasn’t & doesn’t feature in any significant roles in the movies she has featured in. A before search only directs me to primary sources. Furthermore even in the sources provided in Turkish almost all appear to be a Q & A hence not independent of her. whilst the other sources used in the article do not appear to have any editorial oversight nor a reputation for fact checking hence all unreliable sources. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yeah, it seems you are right, it doesn’t have enough reliable sources, so delete the page Tahaaleem (talk) 04:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete First, I want to start by talking about the sources. They don't appear to be Q & A, but rather short biographies published by Turkish newspapers / networks. However, the thing that still makes me concerned is that the article doesn't satisfy the criteria set by WP:NACTOR, as mentioned by Celestina007. She hasn't had any significant, or in other words leading roles, and she doesn't have a "cult" following. So the article can be deleted. Keivan.f^Talk 04:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dear Wikipedia volunteers, I know her because I’m turkish and I’ve heard her name. But that’s doesn’t matter. There are lot of sources. 1 2 3 4 I think enough to notable. Please think it again. Baran Ahmet 06:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, I can read and write in Turkish, and as you can say I’m interested in the Turkish media and music industry. Never in my life I’ve heard her name. But as you said our personal opinions on her don’t necessarily matter. The problem is that she’s a Z-listed actress, with no major roles, awards, or fan base. And yes, there have been short biographies of her published here and there, but that still doesn’t grant her notability. Keivan.f^Talk 08:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found the following sources of Habertürk: [1], FOX: [2], Haberler.com: [3], Sözcü: [4], Sabah: [5] and Haberimport [6] saying that she joined a Turkish TV serie. The other sources are from more minor Turkish publishers: [7], [8], [9], [10]. Interestingly I found no Turkish Q&A sources as said by nominator. Most sources are biographies, but these are published because she joined/left a serie. ~Styyx ^{Hi! ^-^} 09:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is coverage to some extent, no one denied that, but when looking at her filmography you can clearly see that she hasn’t had any “major” roles or awards. Not to mention that she doesn’t have a large “cult” following either. She’s at the start of her career and maybe in a few years she’ll be a prominent actor, but at the moment she doesn’t meet the criteria for a standalone article to be honest. Keivan.f^Talk 17:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the links found supersede NACTOR. matt91486 (talk) 05:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't think that they do. Very short bios that almost read like a PR. Not to mention that she hasn't had a significant career either. Keivan.f^Talk 17:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

16:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As of now, she doesn’t meet the guidelines. Trillfendi (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't read Turkish, but happily Google Translate does, well enough to see that all the hits linked above are casual mentions, namedrops, press releases, promotional sites or all of the above. Certainly the subject is gorgeous, but she fails NACTOR. Ravenswing 12:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. No WP:SIGCOV just mentions, press releases, promo articles // Timothy :: talk 18:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.