Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safe (Phil Wickham song)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A talk page discussion on redirecting or merging the content to Heaven & Earth (Phil Wickham album) is highly encouraged. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Safe (Phil Wickham song)[edit]
- Safe (Phil Wickham song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable song. Existing article on the album which contains this song is more than sufficient. Fails WP:NSONG. SnottyWong confabulate 17:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep About the reason of deletion "Non-notable song". This song "Safe" by Phil Wickham has done a huge impact and success on Billboard Christian Chart and has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from most critics.
About "Existing article on the album which contains this song is more than sufficient". In this artical, I added pretty sufficient and reliable resources and made the contains pretty clear and understandable, including (Background, Collaboration, Critical response, Chart performance), I believe that the artical met the Wikipedia's standards and those contains could satisfy peoplo who want to know what the song is about, what's the meanings behind this song... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai5924677 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Heaven & Earth (Phil Wickham album). Charting single is notable per WP:NSONG, however, I'm not sure there's enough information to warrant an article separate from the album. Uncle Dick (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Redirect to the album. Deletion is inappropriate for a notable song - even if it was non-notable WP:NSONGS guidelines state redirect to the album. As this song does meet notability, keeping may be appropriate as well; however, I am concerned that none of the information in the article (other than its chart position) can be sourced to an independent source. It would not take much to get me to switch to keep, but it's not there yet. Rlendog (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable enough. Otherwise, merge and redirect. Nolelover 01:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.