Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadou Bah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sadou Bah[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NACTOR. No major roles in notable films or television shows and sources are spammy. DanCherek (talk) 02:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 02:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See this for some information regarding a potentially falsified source in this article. DanCherek (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely no evidence of notability per Wikipedia standards. A web search finds nothing but self-promotional fluff, and the source noted above was clearly forged. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Same content is also at Draft:Sadou Bah by same editor. If mainspace is deleted, I recommend nuking draft as well. When a good-faith editor feels like writing about it, they're welcome to do so. DMacks (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. It was already declined at draft, and then the same editor simply created it at mainspace. DMacks (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the sources cited in the article reek of "pay to publish" placements. Roles and coverage don't support notability under WP:NACTOR, nor is there sufficient coverage for WP:GNG. (Oddly, the article makes no mention of Bah being a poultry "entrepreneur", which is mentioned in many of the sources. It also misgenders Bah in the lead.) Schazjmd (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think it would be appropriate to point out here that the page's creator is blocked for misrepresenting sources. Deckkohl (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.