Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEARCHEN.COM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SEARCHEN.COM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because there are no independent references, and no in-depth coverage was found on Google search, does not appear to satisfy software notability or web notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Information on this search engine seems scarce although according to Archive, its been around and in use for many years; if 2005 is accurate, over a decade. Fishnagles (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article sourced to mundane listings and a posting by the company CEO ([1]). The article text does not indicate notability and my searches are not finding anything better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH if considered as a company, and WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; removed CEO article from External links section. Fishnagles (talk) 16:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. No sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The "Keep" vote is from the article's creator. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunatly the company doesn't pass the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.