Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Tudhope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Kept per consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Tudhope[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails ANYBIO because a single nomination for an Oscar is not enough. Subject has to have won or have had multiple nominations. A BEFORE search showed ROUTINE coverage in Hollywood media like Variety and THR but it was either an interview (not independent) or it only mentioned subject in passing. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: According to Variety, Tudhope was also nominated for an Emmy in 2014. That may satisfy WP:ANYBIO. Toughpigs (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 2 nominations (ONE, TWO) for 2 significant awards. The veracity of the nominations, the importance of the awards and the fact that 2>1 being unquestionable~~, he does appear to meet ANYBIO indeed.~~-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ANYBIO:"has been nominated for such an award several times" (emphasis mine). "Several" is more than two; some people would say that several intones more than a couple (2-3) and more than a few (4-5). Chris Troutman (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Thanks, yes. That's true, I had "multiple" in mind (and even then). Removing my !vote. Although I think that could be almost enough, the guideline states it otherwise. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-->and back to Keep but for slightly different reasons: I found MoviesandTelevisionFan's explanation convincing (Thanks) and I therefore think an article about him is not undue and can be well-sourced with what exists.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets 4C of WP:CREATIVE "won significant critical attention" as an Oscar nominee. There is also significant sources on him source 1, source 2, source 3. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 01:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep To be honest, the article is so sparse, it invites a redirect. But since he's been verified as winning an award for two different films, there's no obvious target to redirect to. Hence, the default is to keep as a separate entry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.