Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupert Sandilands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Sandilands[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, not a notable footballer LeftiePete (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFOOTY due to England caps; also [1] is a source. Not sure why you want to delete footballing Ruperts... Spiderone 22:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per SKCRIT 2 or 3 - I have serious concerns about the conduct of the nominator and the nomination is clearly erroneous that I don't believe the nominator has even read the article, let alone undertaken WP:BEFORE. There are references in the article and they clearly show that this player is notable per WP:NFOOTBALL (England international) - the article simply needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 22:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ GiantSnowman (talk · contribs) do you always harass and stalk people on Wikipedia? Leave me alone. Anyway, the footballer nominated to be deleted has hardly any coverage and is not notable.--LeftiePete (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Struck !vote as that counts as double voting. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not sure how this came to be nominated, clearly passes WP:NFOOTY due to national team appearances. Eagleash (talk) 02:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep satisfies WP:NFOOTY. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He played international football for his country. Consequently, he was notable, is notable and will always remain notable. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 13:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. It could do with an improvement tho tbh, maybe an expansion for its upcoming 10-year anniversary could be in order? I've added another ref with plenty of info on him. Crowsus (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After a WP:BEFORE search, the subject meets the spirit of WP:GNG and Wikipedia, therefore should have an article. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and easily - needs to be expanded, but news of his death was reported as far away as Canada. SportingFlyer T·C 11:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep England international, obviously passes WP:NFOOTY guidance on notability. Muchclag (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.