Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roubaix-Lille Métropole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roubaix-Lille Métropole[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citation in article. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 02:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No refs does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads WP:BEFORE. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes notabilty. --Old Time Music Fan (talk) 20:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Lugnuts says, only one ref does not equate to non-notable. (if so, a million articles should be deleted) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.