Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotting Flesh Radio (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rotting Flesh Radio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was kept before, in an AfD which though full of good will and optimism failed to produce reliable sources testifying to the notability of the topic. Drmies (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, and 5 1/2 years after the first AFD this is still nothing more than a fanpage. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very, very few podcasts are notable, probably less than 1%. I see no evidence that this one is in that tiny minority of podcasta that manage to attract significant coverage from reliable sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great name. Delete as non-notable. Bearian (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; not notable. — ΛΧΣ21™ 02:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.