Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotting Flesh Radio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I hope those voting keep will help fix the article. It's tagged for cleanup, but that so rarely does anything... Mangojuicetalk 20:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rotting Flesh Radio[edit]
Advertising spam; prod removed by creator without comment. Actually a repost, but speedy changed to prod by admin. Speedy delete. Pak21 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Not spam, but a resource for the show. It was submitted by an outside source, not involved with the show to serve as a detailed breakdown of the show. A reference since it is the first of its kind for that industry. Disneyana 7 September 2006
- Keep, but the article is a mess and full of unsourced material, and requires a serious cleanup. While ghits are not a guarantee of notability the number here indicates that this is a notable minority interest. Fiddle Faddle 16:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This article needs a POV overhaul. Whether or not it was intended, it reads like an advert ("Many of the show's segments are very niche and fun to listen to. They tend to keep you coming back for more each week"). I've cleaned it up a little for readability. I'm tempted to vote delete due to a lack of verifiable & reliable sourcing or media coverage, especially for the claim that Rotting Flesh Radio is the "First and Only Podcast dedicated to the Haunt Industry specifically". The list of interviewees, however, includes a few notables so I'd rather err on the side of Ridiculously Weak Keep with a much-needed cleanup to remove POV & superfluous detail. -- Scientizzle 00:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, It is a mess as if the entry was made by a first time user who doesn't know the best way to enter articles. I have cleaned it up even more based off of the last comment, and researched some more into the show. There is a large amount of verif. information when I searched it on ghits Many resources have posts for being on the show, and published information about it. I will try to edit more as I can. I say keep. It is getting better with edits. 8 September 2006
- Question Are you sure? It speaks of "weekly". If you can show that one and only one episode has been podcast I will alter my opinion about deletion Fiddle Faddle 09:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I did some searching and it is a weekly show. You can find some of its past resources I found and a back log at a few web addresses.I am not sure how to link them but I will write them here. http://www.podcastdirectory.com , http://www.podcast.net , http://www.podcastlounge.com and a few other podcast directories. It seems Podcast.net has the largest back log. I also did some questioning on some industry forums and it seems they have been around "weekly" since the date it states it was debuted. Sorry for my lack writing skills here, but I am new to wiki.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.254.167.73 (talk • contribs) .
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.